Democratic Council Candidates Offer Visions for the City
The 14 candidates debate for the last time before the June 12 primary.
Alexandria’s 14 Democratic candidates squared off once again shoulder-to-shoulder at the final Alexandria Democratic Committee debate before the June 12 primary.
Candidates expressed concern with challenges faced by many jurisdictions in Northern Virginia—education, fiscal responsibility, transportation and traffic, density and development, infrastructure and affordable housing, among other topics.
Sorenson Institute Executive Director Bob Gibson moderated the panel at George Washington Middle School before a packed house that spilled over into the auditorium’s balcony. Some of the questions were generated through a partnership with ACTion Alexandria, where participants could submit questions online in advance.
Most candidates when asked to name the city’s top three capital spending priorities, answered schools, infrastructure such as sewers and flood control, public safety and transportation.
Building and density is a long-simmering issue in Alexandria and most candidates took a stand when asked: “How would you balance increased development with quality of life issues?”
“As we grow, our needs are going to become greater,” said school administrator John Chapman, adding that the city needs to ensure that it develops “smart” and near transit areas with citizen input.
Preservationist Boyd Walker added: “We need to negotiate better with developers to make sure we get what we need” while Victoria Menjivar, an advocate for underserved communities, said don’t assume that with increased development, lives improve.
“We need to include people such as low-income communities in the discussion,” she said.
Sean Holihan said better development could mean increased quality of life. “I have to cross King Street three times” to get to a shopping center, he pointed out. “Should we build densely in Old Town? No. But in Potomac Yard we have an open canvas.”
Councilman Paul Smedberg extended that idea by saying the city has tremendous opportunities to “create the new Old Towns, the new Del Rays or the new Rosemonts, but they will be based around transit centers with public amenities.”
He added later in response to a question about the Patent and Trademark Office that the city has the opportunity to get the “next PTO” and get some “big wins” but there’s increasing competition to do that.
Small business owner Melissa Feld and Holihan agreed the city needs to be smart about figuring out ways to grow its revenues so that it can give more to operate schools and other key parts of the community.
Michael Hepburn said City Council has a “great responsibility to provide resources” to Alexandria City Public Schools, “one of the most vital assets that we have.”
Transportation planner Tim Lovain said smart growth can reduce car traffic. He advocated proper mixed-use development and transit-oriented development as well as complete streets welcoming to pedestrians and bikes.
Sammie Moshenberg said quality of life includes funding for the arts and paying more attention to the city’s diversity, including racial diversity.
Justin Wilson said it’s up to the community whether its members want to think of development as something that “happens to us” or something that “we as a community can shape.”
Both Arthur Peabody and Allison Silberberg agreed that the question must be posed as to just what kind of community do we all want to live in.
“We hear development should be around Metro stops, but we see the challenge of BRAC,” Peabody said.
Donna Fossum, a member of the Planning Commission, highlighted the Beauregard Plan as an example of good quality of life on the way, saying it was helpful that stakeholders could talk directly with developers for transparency and dialogue.
Councilwoman Del Pepper agreed that the Beauregard development with its 40 acres of open space, 800 units of affordable housing and transparent planning process shows development can be good.
The candidates also tackled the issue of citizen engagement and some, such as Wilson and Feld, said evening Council meetings could try offering childcare so that more people could attend. Additionally, Lovain said the city could try more use of the Internet, electronic town meetings and webinars.
“Maybe citizens could go to the Internet on Sunday and submit questions that could be discussed at a Tuesday night Council meeting," he said, adding that current meetings are "staff giving speeches to citizens” and vice versa with no real dialogue, he said.
For more Patch coverage of the 2012 elections, see our Elections Page, follow Old Town Alexandria Patch and Del Ray Patch on Twitter. Like Old Town Alexandria Patch and Del Ray Patch on Facebook.
Boyd Walker
12:34 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
It was a very interesting Debate last night, and I think especially important was the open forum at the end where groups of candidates got to discuss topics. That I thik wil give voters a feel of what the candidates will be like on council. I really appreciated the opportunnity to participate and I look forward to working with the other nominees if I am sucessful next Tuesday.
Simon Saivil
9:26 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Was Mr. Peabody, true to form, obsequious to the moderator and co-panelists, and inordinately rude to the audience and constituents? I contemplated attending, but, being unable to get over Mr. Peabody's rudeness of more than a year ago, I thought better of it.
Simon Saivil
Gail G
9:37 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Simon, please share your experience with Peabody that happened last year. My husband and I were treated very rudely and disrepectfully by Peabody in front of other people at a candidate kickoff back in 2009.
Simon Saivil
1:36 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Mrs. Gordon:
In early 2011, after attending a School Board hearing where Dr. Sherman and the rest of the Board attempted to ramrod through their agenda - ultimately being defeated - I attended a meeting at Lyles-Crouch where Mr. Peabody accompanied Dr. Sherman. At the end of the meeting I approached Mr. Peabody and, entirely calmly and good-naturedly, attempted to ask more about the intent to extend the school days and the school year.
Mr. Peabody was stunningly defensive, speaking at me, rather than to me, in such a tone of voice that the only proper English word for his behaviour was "rudeness." He made sure that my enquiry would receive a short shrift, and I hastened to make sure that his rudeness would not last a second longer than what I was exposed to up that moment.
The man clearly thinks he is entitled and regards the parents and his constituents as a mere nuisance on his way to an elective office. I do hope very much that those beholden to Mr. Peabody and other sycophants will be shown the door come November.
Simon Saivil
Gail G
2:36 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Thanks Simon. When my husband and I approached Arthur Paebody at a campaign kickoff for another candidate in 2009 with a serious issue we had regarding fraud in the athletic program at TC, his response to us was "I find that sometimes if I ignore these things they tend to take care of themselves." That is Arthur Peabody's definition of constituent service - ignore your constituents until they go away.