Waterfront Plan Opponents Seek to Raise Funds for Legal Case
Citizens for an Alternative Waterfront Plan seeks to raise about $50,000 to pay for the legal costs accrued by three women who have sued the city over a waterfront rezoning issue.
Citizens for an Alternative Alexandria Waterfront Plan is hosting a “mailing party” Tuesday evening in an effort to fundraise for the citizens seeking to squelch city efforts to rezone parts of the riverside, allowing development such as hotels.
CAAWP leader Andrew Macdonald said the group seeks to raise about $50,000 for legal fees, but hopes that some of the work related to the case will be offered pro bono.
“This is a VERY important mail out. The three petitioners, Marie Kux, Beth Gibney, and April Burke, as well as Mark Mueller and Bert Ely, both of whom have been integral to the legal process, need our support in reaching out to donors to pay for the legal bills incurred as a result of the petition effort,” reads a marketing effort by CAAWP, which is not a party in the suit but supporting its efforts.
Waterfront landowners Kux, Gibney and Burke recently filed a lawsuit that is currently before Alexandria Circuit Court asking that their petition be approved. The petition would prompt a supermajority, or at least 6-1, vote by City Council to pass the waterfront plan. Council on a 5-2 vote passed the waterfront plan, but not the rezoning amendment because it is tied up in legal issues.
"The City Council's vote was a reflection of the majority of residents who support the plan. We would hope the efforts of ALL citizens would focus on reuniting our community, accepting the vote and moving our community in more positive direction," said Gina Baum, representing Waterfront for All, a group of citizens supporting the city's plan. "It is their prerogative to sue, but citizens should be aware there is also a cost to the city to defend the case. There will be many points throughout this process where citizens will have additional input [such as through a special permitting process]. We do feel that continuing to battle legally is a tremendous disservice to the community and the democratic process."
The event takes place at Pat Troy’s in Old Town at 4:30 p.m.
Drew Hansen
9:01 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
A comment was deleted for violating our terms of use.
Katy Cannady
8:51 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
The waterfront small area plan creates a frame work that governs what will be built within that framework. The special use permits determine only the details of what will be built. The big decisions have already been made in the small area plan. Fortunately the waterfront small area plan as passed by five members of City Council (Mayor Euille, Vice Mayor Donley, Mrs. Pepper, Mr. Krupicka, and Mr. Smedberg) may never be acted upon if the Circuit Court or the Board of Zoning Appeals rules that the homeowners' petition was valid. Being passed by this City Council does not mean the waterfront plan is popular with most citizens. American history is full of examples of elected officials who made unpopular decisions and paid a price for it. It is note worthy that in this case two of the decision makers - the Vice Mayor and Mr. Krupicka aren't planning to face the voters this fall.
Fred Krambeck
11:50 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
It is a desservice to the democratic process for the City to ignore a valid petition, thus forcing citizens to pay legal expenses to defend their legal rights. It is even worse that the City will use some of the same citizens' tax money to suppress the citizens' rights. The City also has a history of pursuing endless appeals whenever a court decision goes against them, creating even more burdens for the citizens.