patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Residents Slam City's Waterfront Proposal but Business Praises It

A marathon meeting on the city's latest proposal for Old Town Alexandria's waterfront heard 35 speakers

 

As Faroll Hamer, director of the City of Alexandria’s Planning and Zoning Department, presented the latest draft proposing significant changes to the waterfront before a standing room only crowd at City Hall, a member of the audience sporting a sticker with the slogan “Don’t rezone the waterfront” audibly said, “When are these people going to stop speaking so we can scream at them?”

That largely was the atmosphere at the meeting where a majority of 35 speakers slammed the proposal, saying the city was ham-handed in its crafting of the ill-conceived plan and that it favors hotels and commercialism over the best interests of residents and the city.

Hamer pointed out in her opening remarks that 21 large community meetings and 52 general interest confabs had been held on the issue prior to Tuesday night’s meeting.

Planning and Zoning Deputy Director Karl Moritz acknowledged in his presentation that the city has considered “key issues that folks have brought up” such as the amount and type of development, timing, flood mitigation, parking, a building proposed for a waterfront park and regulatory approvals.

But “nothing has elicited quite as much excitement as a hotel on the waterfront…We think hotels are a good use,” he said. “They have the lowest impacts on traffic and parking,” and added that they would be developed over a 15-year period.

Clapping followed speakers opposing the plan while hissing occasionally came after plan proponents.

“The plan is more appropriate for National Harbor,” said first speaker Bert Ely. “I urge to postpone until the fall to consider the plan.”

Andrew Macdonald, former vice mayor of the city, commended earlier development of the area when toxic warehouses turned into a park but added, “What started so well began to unravel…The current plan builds upon the 1980s development” and today the city wants to “exploit the waterfront just as stupidly.”

Macdonald said the city “has disenfranchised key components of the city” and the process has not included a dialogue with residents.

“You must reject this plan and the zoning changes on which it rests,” he said. New zoning proposals would allow hotels and commercial development in some places where it is currently not allowed.

A document dated Apr. 5 from the Robinson Terminal Warehouse Corporation to the Planning Commission said the current plan “will be read by potential purchasers as, in essence, requiring hotels at both Robinson properties,” but a hotel consultant has told Robinson that “a hotel simply is not a viable use, specifically at Robinson sites.”

The Robinson Corporation also told the city in this memo that the city’s study “uses data gathered from completely different markets nearer to the Metro” rather than at the waterfront.

President of the Old Town Civic Association John Gosling said at the meeting 79 percent of his group’s members are not in favor of the plan and asked that the plan “make a stronger commitment to civic and cultural amenities.”

Residents opposed to the plan repeatedly criticized its lack of embracing Alexandria’s rich cultural heritage and called it a cookie-cutter plan for “Anytown, USA.”

James McCall, a member of the Alexandria Archaeological Commission who wrote the history piece of the plan, asked: “What about this plan celebrates Alexandria specifically?” He said the current plan depends too much on developers to “create these cultural elements.”

However, Judy Noritake, chair of the Park and Recreation Commission, offered her support for the plan but asked the council to consider including a park maintenance facility and a place to put garbage. She added that the off-leash dog park at Founders Park should be moved, which elicited several opposing comments from later speakers.

The Alexandria Chamber of Commerce and the Alexandria Convention and Visitors Association offered a handful of speakers supporting the plan.

Chamber Chairman-elect Andrew Palmieri urged the commission to approve the waterfront plan. “We’re concerned it might not go far enough, but we think it’s good enough to move forward.”

The Alexandria Restaurant Commission also supported the plan.

Charlotte Hall, vice president of the Potomac Riverboat Company, supported the plan on behalf of ACVA.

Bittersweet Catering and  Cafe owner Jody Manor, also speaking on behalf of ACVA, said he opened a business in the waterfront area food court last year “and I can tell you that Alexandria’s waterfront is appalling.”

Lauren Garcia and Val Hawkins of the Alexandria Economic Development Partnership supported the plan.

The commission intends to take action on the plan in May.

Do you think the city should allow hotels and other development on the waterfront? Tell us in the comments.

Sissy Walker

6:58 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Boutique hotels and pensions would be great and permit a more neighborhood-y feel than generic full-service hotels. Our waterfront should offer something qualitatively different than Baltimore or National Harbor - we can't compete on their terms so let's provide something that will really call people HERE, to do and see things you can only do in OUR unique environment. Where is our unique history and culture in this plan? It seems to me what's great about Old Town is just that - it's a TOWN. It's accessible (well, not as much as it used to be), it's walkable, it's HUMAN sized! I think we can create something a lot more interesting and multi-layered than what's on the table. Keep at it!

Reply

Mo

9:42 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Old-town style development with an emphasis on walking paths, boating and parks along the waterfront would be a great thing for Old Town. This is the place where currently there is a food court taking up potentially beautiful space that could be a cute cafe or something more appealing to both residents and tourists. The waterfront is always busy on nice days, it would be nice to build it up and make it really nice. Our Planning and Zoning Commission really needs new blood -- why did they allow a SUBWAY to go into a beautiful spot right across from City Hall? Sex stores along King? It's like they operate without a feeling of who they are -- a family friendly darling waterfront town with amazing history. They should be looking for charming anchor stores to bring business to the area which will only help the smaller boutiques -- if people are there to shop, everyone wins! The city should be approaching businesses such as Vineyard Vines, Jcrew kids, etc, that fit nicely into this community and do well in waterfront cities (like Annapolis/Georgetown) such as ours. The Lorien Hotel and Spa on King is a fabulous model for a lovely boutique hotel experience for visitors that would be tasteful along the waterfront. I'm glad residents are standing up and taking notice of the Commission, and hopefully the insights from residents will be put to good use -- we only want what's the best for our fair city!

Reply

Bea Porter

9:50 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

There are plenty of hotels along King Street and further up in Olde Towne, we don't need more on the waterfront. Look across the river at National Harbor, that's horrible, there is no open land, we need to keep our parks and open waterfront spaces. Change the plan. Leave us green, and I mean green grass.

Reply

irret

1:20 pm on Monday, April 11, 2011

the city SHOULD NOT be developing the waterfront. there is too much pollution from trash and fertilizer runoff getting into the river now. why do these govt and business people think that every square inch of earth has to be covered with buildings, sidewalks and cement?

the city should be looking to purchase the GENON property.. after GENON is forced to close... for polluting old town for decades now. then the city should turn it into a little wilderness area. after all the city and the developers chased every living mammal out from rt1 onto gw parkway to be slaughtered by cars. so they should give back some of what they took away.

Reply

Cindy

11:32 am on Thursday, June 9, 2011

I would like to hear from long-term residents of Old Town on this subject. They've lived through lots of change, and saw what worked and what didn't. They could easily see through what is merely people resisting change and people who really see that a mistake is about to be made with the city (or not). There are at least a couple residents who live near me who have been in Old Town for at least 50 years and have seen a lot of change, including a lot of resident fears and complaints through those changes. I wish someone would locate them and do a story on their viewpoints. I've only been here about 10 years.

Reply

Leave a comment